{"id":604,"date":"2005-12-07T16:50:00","date_gmt":"2005-12-07T16:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.beatzo.net\/blog\/2005\/12\/just-to-point-out-that-i-still-rule\/"},"modified":"2005-12-07T16:50:00","modified_gmt":"2005-12-07T16:50:00","slug":"just-to-point-out-that-i-still-rule","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beatzo.net\/blog\/2005\/12\/just-to-point-out-that-i-still-rule\/","title":{"rendered":"Just to point out that I still rule."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I knew this would happen. Don&#8217;t ask me how, but I knew.<\/p>\n<p>The context: The comics quiz I did three days ago. There was one pretty straightforward question &#8211; &#8220;In comics, what is a ret-con?&#8221;. The question went to DD and Ochintya&#8217;s team, and as they were trying to explain the concept, I asked them to give me an example, which would make things easier for all of us. Their answer was that a ret-con is creating an established history for a known character &#8211; &#8220;RETroCONceptualizing&#8221; him\/her, so to speak, and the example they gave was that of the Phantom, creating the histories of all the Phantoms much later after the character&#8217;s creation. Which was the wrong definition, and so the question passed to Udupa and Dibyo&#8217;s team, who said it was changing the history of a character, like <i>Batman : Year One<\/i>. I gave them points ( because I am a lenient quizmaster, and am fairly generous with points. ), and the next thing I know, the rest of the teams ( with the exception of <a href=\"http:\/\/al_lude.livejournal.com\/\" class=\"lj-user\">al_lude<\/a> and Co. who were trying to look as nonchalant as possible. Possibly because they were leading by quite a huge margin at that point.) are clamouring for my blood. Among the shouts, I could hear someone shrieking the words &#8220;Alan Moore&#8221; and &#8220;Swamp Thing&#8221; rather loudly, to which I responded, in true God Mode, with the words &#8220;Alan Moore&#8217;s version of Swamp Thing was not a ret-con. We can discuss this later, and that&#8217;s that&#8221;. Things cooled down, the quiz progressed, there was no rain of hellfire and brimstone.<\/p>\n<p>So today I get a mail from <a href=\"http:\/\/shakuni.blogspot.com\">Shakuni<\/a> with an impassioned subject-line &#8220;Why Beatzo, Why?&#8221;, a mail in which he copy-pastes this segment from Wikipedia:<\/p>\n<p><i>The term &#8220;retroactive continuity&#8221; was popularized by comic book writer Roy Thomas in his 1980s series All-Star Squadron, which featured the DC Comics superheroes of the 1940s. The earliest known use of the term is from Thomas&#8217;s letter column in All-Star Squadron #20 (April 1983), where Thomas wrote that he heard it at a convention. The term was shortened to &#8220;retcon&#8221; by Damian Cugley in 1988 on USENET to describe a development in the comic book Swamp Thing, in which Alan Moore reinterpreted the events of the title character&#8217;s origin. (See &#8220;Examples&#8221;, below.)<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Alan Moore&#8217;s additional information about the Swamp Thing&#8217;s origins didn&#8217;t contradict or change any of the events depicted in the character&#8217;s previous appearances, but changed the underlying interpretation of them. This verges on making alterations to past continuity.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Hmm. Now I knew about the Roy Thomas origin of the word, and I had based this question off John Ostrander&#8217;s column in the first issue of <i>Shazam: A New Beginning<\/i>#1 by Ostrander and Tom Mandrake, one of those ret-conned series of the mid-eighties, in which Billy Batson&#8217;s origin is retold with minor variations. I honestly did not look at the Wikipedia entry, nor did I know that the term gained prominence through USENET; I had always figured it was a hardcore comicbook term, with none of the l33t-public intruding onto its origins. So I guess that was a boo-boo on my part. <\/p>\n<p>BUT<\/p>\n<p><i>Alan Moore&#8217;s additional information about the Swamp Thing&#8217;s origins didn&#8217;t contradict or change any of the events depicted in the character&#8217;s previous appearances, but changed the underlying interpretation of them. This verges on making alterations to past continuity.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Technically speaking, &#8220;verges on making alterations to past continuity&#8221; is NOT the same as &#8220;making alterations to past continuity&#8221; or, more specifically &#8220;adding new information to &#8216;historical&#8217; material, or deliberately changing previously established facts in a work of serial fiction.&#8221; Moore did not change a word of what happened before, if I remember correctly, he just gave a different explanation for why things happened (which i won&#8217;t mention here because they are quite spoilerific) , and cleared up quite a bit of misunderstandings. Like that bit about Alex Olsen. So technically, I was not wrong, eh? Eh? Eh? So I still maintain that Dibyo and Udupa deserved their points, because they specifically said &#8220;changing the history of an established character&#8221;, and that ( war-dance) is (war- whoop) exactly (yodel) what ( yabadabadoo) a (tippity tappity tap) ret-con is. (Phew!) <\/p>\n<p>We need to get a life, JK. Seriously. I could feel the pain of that &#8216;Why beatzo, Why?&#8221;, you know. Just in case you&#8217;re still peeved, I will burn a DVD for you. With oodles of stuff on it. I will even sign and number it, if you want. So smile, da.<\/p>\n<p>P.S Please try and do Graphic Rampage next year. Or do a version in Chennai.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I knew this would happen. Don&#8217;t ask me how, but I knew. The context: The comics quiz I did three days ago. There was one pretty straightforward question &#8211; &#8220;In comics, what is a ret-con?&#8221;. The question went to DD and Ochintya&#8217;s team, and as they were trying to explain the concept, I asked them [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-604","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beatzo.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/604","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beatzo.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beatzo.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beatzo.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beatzo.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=604"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beatzo.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/604\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beatzo.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=604"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beatzo.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=604"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beatzo.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=604"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}