July 16th. New Harry Potter book. Big hullaballoo. Midnight parties. Kids going wild. Adults going wild. “Who’s going to die this time?”
Excuse me, did you just say “Who’s going to die this time?”?
Yesterday I was sitting on my bed, reading the latest issue of this weekly Indian newsmagazine whose name I forget because they all look and feel the same. The cover-story happened to be – you guessed it – Harry Potter. Never mind that the cover shows Danny “I am tough n gritty cos I am growin up” Radcliffe, surrounded by what the cover-photoshopper decided was angsty Potter-like fire. Never mind that the so-called cover story was more of the same vaguely fandomish remarks like “I love Harry Potter because he wears glasses.” from assorted kids, one of whom was Om Puri’s son. There was a two-page synopsis of all the five books so far – loads of name-dropping and all, and a side story about this psychiatrist who refuses to believe that Harry Potter encourages witchcraft of any kind. Oh yeah? What about those dead chickens I saw near the bookstore, lady? And yeah, the writer of the article even put in a spoiler that was pretty much obvious anyways. The answer to the question that floats around everytime a new post-Goblet Potter book comes around.
“Who’s going to die this time?”
What worried me a little was this – after reading the whole article through, I lay back and began to think of my experiences with Harry Potter. And I found that I could not remember anything at all about Order of the Phoenix, the fifth book, the one which Sasi bought on the day of its release and I read before him.
Things I remember:
- a couple of Fred and George’s misdemeanours
- the Fredric-Werthamish Defence Against The Dark Arts teacher
- things in the magical world falling apart because Voldemort is back
- why the book was called OotP
- the answer to the eventual “Who dies at the end?” dilemma.
Did anything actually happen? In all the other books, the name is enough to give me an inkling of how the story went. Ootp might have been the hugest of the books, but it seems to me surprisingly devoid of any content, other than isolated episodes leading to a random death.
Rowling claims that the ending to the Half Blood Prince is so shocking that it left her unable to write any more. ( well, there is nothing left to write after the ending, so it doesn’t really make sense ) Before the last book, she said the ending made her sit and weep for quite sometime. Granted, all these proclamations might be nothing other than hype – but it seems to me more like a desperate attempt to make things gritty and “serious” than is actually required. I know, I know, Rowling has always said that the books might not end on a happy note; I just don’t like the way the series seems to have become an exercise in guess-who-will-die-next type endings. I have a very strong feeling that I might take to ignoring books 4-7 in the future, and stick to the first three, which were fun to read, and are also good gifts. I mean, you can’t give away books whose endings leave you flabbergasted with random character deaths, can you?
Though there is a strong chance that I might be getting a Rowling-signed copy of The Half Blood Prince when it’s released.