Uncategorized

Psycho. And some odds and ends.

I learnt about the Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho from a short story in a 1982 comic-book called House of Mystery, published by DC comics – in which a character says something about getting nightmares from seeing the Hitchcock movie when she was a kid.

Now my uncle owned a video cassette parlour back then, one of the swankiest ones in Guwahati at that time, in fact. Just for the record, his was named Kareng(Kareng is the Assamese word for palace, and it was actually a store selling everything from swanky gift items to (slurp) Leo Mattel toys.) The other good parlours in the city at that time were Forbidden Fruits and Channel 2000, both of which had good collections, but demanded an advance payment of two hundred rupees before you were allowed to rent any tapes, so no wonder that I preferred to stick to the goodies Kareng offered. Needless to explain how much fun it is, for a thirteen-year old kid, to browse through the racks of VHS tapes. Occasionally, that is, after half-yearly and annual examinations were over, my father would borrow a VCR (my mother, worrying about the state of her son’s educational tendencies, vetoed the idea of buying one) and I would be given carte blanche to watch movies.

My uncle was, of course, very particular about which tapes I took from the library. But that was ok, because there were tonnes of good stuff I was allowed to watch. Nagina and Nigahen were perennial favourites of mine – and so were movies like Commando(both the Mithun and the Schwarzenegger version), Rambo – all the standard bang-bang stuff that’s part of one’s boyhood.

But then there was the sudden urge to watch Psycho, based on a recommendation in the aforementioned comic-book, and further aided by the sight of this nice looking lady screaming on the back-cover, and she was, of course, decidedly wet – a potent combination, you’ll agree. A sinister looking house on the front cover and a silhouette of a man standing there – can you imagine how much an over-active imagination can make out of all these black-and-white images? I wanted to see Psycho, boss, and as far as things were concerned, the world would end the next day if I didn’t find a way to see it. ( These kind of world-will-end-if-I-don’t-do-this- feelings still persist, I am sorry to say )

I was a nice little mamma’s boy back then, so I followed the best option I could think of – I went to my uncle with the videocassette and asked him – “Can I watch this, please? A friend told me it’s very good.” ( Let it be pointed out that comics are indeed a boy’s best friend, so this wasn’t technically a lie)

My uncle took a good look at the cover. “Hmm, Alfred Hitchcock, eh? Your friend is right – it’s a classic movie, but you might get scared. You sure you can handle it?” I tried very hard to look offended by that query, but of course, the grin just wouldn’t go away and I walked home a happy man. Woo-hoo, it’s great when a scary movie turns out to be a classic movie at the same time.

My mother threw a fit. “I don’t care if it’s Alfred Hitchcock or Pomfret Some-hen. I won’t have you seeing these frightful films at this age. Go and return this AT ONCE! And tell your uncle that I’ll have a word with him sometime about this.” Foiled! And inspite of being so close. Ah, well, I was thirteen anyway, and I decided it was high time I got into the adolescent rebellion phase every thirteen-year-old guy indulged in, at least back in those days. So I went to the my corner of the room me and my sister shared, and sulked. I didn’t dare refuse dinner,but chewed my food in a very cold way, which I am fairly sure convinced my mother about my teenage angst.

She relented, of course. But I knew she had a talk with my uncle, because the next time I asked my uncle for a videotape, he said – “Are you sure baidew knows about this?” before handing over the tape. Poor guy.

As I was saying, she relented, and I watched Psycho with all the enthusiasm I could muster. Which involved locking up all the windows, and in particular the door that led to my parent’s bedroom – so that the screams wouldn’t be too audible ( I was also concerned about whose screams they would be, mine or those of the nice lady on the cover) And I began, prepared to be scared out of my wits.

The movie began with a (gulp) scene in a hotel room, which made me extremely glad that Ma wasn’t around to check out classic movie what her son was seeing. Then the slow parts began. This happens, that happens, everything happens except for the GOOD bits, you know, the scary stuff I was preparing for. But the background music made me queasy at times, especially when the girl with the money was on the road and she thinks her boss is crossing the road ahead of her. To be frank, I had a hard time following the story, it was too “talkey” for my taste, and I had the vague idea that this girl was running away with a lot of money and wanted to be with her boyfriend.

Then she checks into a motel, and things get suitably atmosphery, because I recognised the house in the background as the same one on the cover. Could the silhouette be the same nice, embarassed guy who runs the motel? Let’s see, but things were definitely getting interesting, because the guy tried to spy on the girl through a hole in the wall behind a painting.

Woohoo, and then it happens. The “infamous shower scene”, as the back cover of the videocassette put it, the one that was supposed to give me nightmares and make me scared of going inside a bathroom for at least a week. Bloody hell, it came and went, and the only thing I could make out of it was the screaming, definitely not mine, and strangely not the lady’s, but that of the violins in the background. And what was this? A black figure whose hand lifted and struck, and the girl JUST DIES? What an obvious con-job of editting, I thought, of course, those two are in seperate frames, and it was all camera angles and sticking different bits of film together. And what a waste of a pretty face!

At this point, I confess that the finer points of film-watching was lost on me. I had been cheated out what had been promised to me – and it appeared obvious to me who had killed the girl. Of course, it was the mother, that old lady with the scary voice. Poor Norman Bates, his tentative affair with the girl was ruined because of his mother! Humph!

But sanity still remained, and I decided to stick with the movie. Let me see how she gets her just desserts, the old crone, I thought.

About an hour and a half later, when the movie ended, I was stuck in my chair, grinning to myself. Because I had realised why Psycho was a classic movie, and why my uncle had said that Alfred Hitchcock made good movies. I wasn’t still scared – nosirree – but just awed by the twists and turns of the story, how I had been pulled into believing what was not, how everything, right from the silhouette on the cover, to Norman’s vaguely embarrassed attempts to make conversation with the girl, to his scream of “Oh NO, MOTHER!”, and everything else – made sense, and was tied with that thread of completeness that warms every little boy’s heart. I loved the way every question was answered towards the end, and I loved the ending. Though I would have been happier if the pretty lady in the shower hadn’t died.

I saw Psycho many times again, the same tape, which I never returned, because my uncle sold off his videotape section of his store to some lucky guy from Shillong, and that part of Kareng became a showroom for television sets. Over the years, I recommended, and passed it over to friends, and would occasionally watch it with them too, maintaining a suitable dead-pan face on the good bits, especially at the points they would try to guess what happens next. Guess who laughed loud when the ending came about, and those guys were gaping at the screen? But there were times when people would accurately predict the outcome, and that would make me vaguely disappointed about my own inability to have done so, once upon my first time. But then, I would console myself, a thirteen-year old is only supposed to know so much.

Nowadays, I doubt if anyone would be taken unawares by the first viewing of Psycho. There are far too many ripoffs, far too many stories about serial killers, and pretty young things getting killed at the beginning of the movie, and of course, television shows. I think I got lucky, and saw it at the right point of time in my life, eh?

A couple of years later, most likely three years later, I came across two issues of a magazine in a second-hand sale. The magazine was called Hammer‘s House of Horror, a British magazine devoted to horror movies. The first of these issues had the painting of a sinister-looking man with a knife on the cover, and the blurb read “The Legacy of Psycho: Slasher Films” ( or something of that sort), and inside was a most delicious feature on the complete making of Psycho, including a still-by-still breakup of the shower-scene – about a hundred-odd black and white pictures on a single page, ending with the backwards’ shot of the eye, and an interview with Saul Bass – Hitchcock’s assistant who claimed credit for the scene – and also the first reference I had to the ‘chocolate sauce or tomato ketchup’ debate. The magazine, among other things also included an interview with a guy named Robert Bloch, by another guy named Jim Steranko ( whose works on Marvel comics was legendary at that time, especially to li’l Mile-High-Comics-catalogue-reading me), from which I got to know that Psycho was written by Bloch, and adapted by Hitchcock.

I bought a copy of Robert Bloch’s Psycho when I was in college, it was a 1960’s edition, which came out immediately after the movie was released, and included stills from the film. To my surprise, it was also quite different from the movie.

Among other things, the magazine also had a comic-adaptation of an R Chetwynd-Hayes story, illustrated in Glorious black-and-white by John Bolton. The legacy of Psycho section included, among other things, triple-page reviews of movies I had never heard before, called The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Friday The Thirteenth and Halloween.

The other Hammer magazine I bought had a catalogue of horror films, with cast-listing, summary, and occasionally, a still from the movie or a poster. Life was never quite the same again.

It’s really strange that inspite of most of the lesser-known Hitchcock movies being reissued in India, Psycho is still not available, in any format, VCD or DVD.

Oh, and for the record, psasidhar has the videocassette with him now, and he was supposed to get a VCD made out of it.

In Grant Morrison’s run on New X-Men, there are these characters called The Stepford Cuckoos, five adolescent girls with telepathic powers, who speak in unison and are Emma Frost’s protegees. I had kind of wondered where the name came from, and was pretty much sure ( without really thinking about it) that “Stepford” came from Ira Levin‘s book The Stepford Wives. Sometime later, when I actually thought about it, I got the “Cuckoos” part of the name. It comes from John Wyndham‘s The Midwich Cuckoos, of course. I have read Wyndham’s Day of the Triffids, not Midwich Cuckoos, though. It is about all the women in a village ( called Midwich, duh) getting impregnated by aliens and giving birth to super-intelligent, telepathically linked children who set about to ruling the world.

I don’t know whether to be happy that I found this out, or appalled at not figuring it out sooner.

Standard

33 thoughts on “Psycho. And some odds and ends.

  1. I was 15 when I watched _Psycho_. I knew nothing about the movie, but associated Hitchcock with the Three Investigator series. It was good, and I just loved the last line of the movie. I didn’t find it scary but did watch every thing else directed by Hitchcock.

    • I didn’t find it scary

      Precisely. It might have been scary when it came out in the 60’s, but the mass of imitations and inspirations throughout the years have gone a long way in getting rid of the shock-factor.

      And I began reading Three Investigators AFTER I watched Psycho. :)

    • Aiyyo! High praise.

      But seriously, I don’t think I can write the way Ratheesh does – the way he brings the Kerala of his childhood to life with his words. I would love to see a movie he makes, too!

  2. Great story and great recounting!

    It does amaze me, at times, how many books, movies, etc. one has to read, see, etc., in order to understand everything else one wants to see, read, etc.

    • Thank you!

      That’s an interesting thought. Yes, it’s true that everytime I prepare a roadmap of things I want to read and see, the very next moment I discover a whole lot of OTHER things, either in the same genre, or which inspired part of my List, or were inspired by it, or would just make for good viewing/reading.

      But life wouldn’t be as interesting without this, so I am all for the Next Thing Around the Corner. :)

  3. Because I didn’t see Psycho until I was about 19, I knew all about the shower scene. As such, I was much more impressed with the second murder, which just seems to come flying at you from nowhere. No buildup, just brutality.

    • It took me about ten seconds to think of which was the second murder. Just shows how much attention the shower scene gets.

      But there was a buildup, right? The guy goes into the house, and is walking up the stairs….wait, is it that scene you’re talking about, or is there another one I am missing here?

      • Well, yes, there is a manner of buildup. But there’s no buildup to the appearance of the killer. We have him going slowly, nervously up the steps… and then in the overhead shot, s/he just wheels around the corner at high-speed and slams him in the chest. Boo-yah.

    • Sheesh. Is it because I included spoilers in the post?

      Seriously, you should watch Psycho once with your eyes closed, just to savour the background score. And once, with the sound off, to admire the camerawork. :) The story is predictable, I agree, but the film is still a classic.

  4. bal kelaa…

    I think I watched this masterpiece when I was 15..or 16. Maybe bal kelaas are all precocious because they watch all the right movies before the rest of the world:).

    Talking about hitchcock, I enjoyed Rear Window a lot (grace kelly was probably in it too and another reason for my obsession!).
    One of the million reasons for you to visit the states is to go see universal studios – florida where they have hitchcock’s gallery and the original set of the bathroom scene is still preserved. Top it all, the Rear Window set has been reconstructed as well ;)

    • Rear Window is also one of my fav Hitchcock movies. the last scene where the truth is revealed in the dark room juxtaposed with the flashes from the camera light is mind-blowing in its suspense generation.

      • Yes, rear window is quite a movie – classy,romantic,suspenseful and I loved the lead pair so much so that I saw them in my dreams as well.

        That last scene is quite amazing with flashlight of the camera :).

        Shall add you on my list, if its okay.

    • Re: bal kelaa…

      Maybe bal kelaas are all precocious because they watch all the right movies before the rest of the world:)

      Even before the director himself, eh? You overestimates us, preciouss.

      I haven’t seen Rear Window. I haven’t seen too many of Hitchcock’s movies – maybe just one or two, besides Psycho. Need to, someday.

  5. My own personal trivia

    I share my birthday with Alfred Hitchcock :D
    I think he was the greatest showman of twentieth century. Like while Psycho was screened people were actually turned back if they arrived late for screening. Also the shower scene was more shocking because Janet Leigh (the actress playing the victim) was the only popular star in the movie. It is like having publicized a movie with Julia Roberts and killing her off in the first few minutes.
    BTW Alfred Hitchcock was also known to be a misogynist

    • hope u share the man’s flair for good cinema too ;)
      wouldnt call him the greatest showman, tho he was one of the bolder directors of his time in terms of the reasons u gave..

      • Well I do like his kind of movies.
        I also liked rear window. I had actually seen a botched up desi version of it first( I didnt know it was a ripoff of rear window at that time). Actually that esi version had a nice way of nativising it with the heroine witnessing the act instead of the hero. Heroine is also locked up in her room by her father because of the poor boy/ rich girl love cliche. But it lost it from there. I like movies which are not “one trick ponies”. You know where the film maker has actually put some thought into it and misleads you towards something because u now the genre. Sixth sense had that (Unfortunately for me I guessed the ending midway thru the movie)
        Try this Rear window review

        • i actually enjoyed Sixth Sense, having NOT figured out the end. it was prolly Shayamalan’s best movie. he’s gotten way too formulaic after that n the rest of his movies have only gone on a downward slide.

          lemme knw the name of the Desi rip-off if u remember :D

          • Yeah, shyamalan is caught up in the need to do a supernatural thriller with a twist. My feeling is he can do emational stories with/without the supernatural part quite competantly.

            That desi movie was a tamil one. So I dont know if it will be useful to you. The way it went wrong was the director decided to include a cop hero and after that the movie moves outside the room. The whole point of rear window was the clastrophobic atmosphere the protagonist is caught in (so by extension we are too since everything is in his POV).

    • Re: My own personal trivia

      the greatest showman of twentieth century.

      No, no. That’s Subhash Ghai, the man who popularised walk-in roles for himself in his films. Seems Hitchcock was so taken by the concept that he began to follow Ghai’s practice.

Leave a Reply to metal_storm Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.